http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29997
--- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
All the insns in sh_expand_epilogue need to be examined to see if they need
REG_CFA notes. Some of them already have them. I don't know what more are
needed.
For example, look at the changes made to the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29997
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29997
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-12-22 12:53:39 UTC ---
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I think we encode proligue and epilogues now for all targets.
It's been done for several targets, but when lo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29997
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-22
03:26:11 UTC ---
I think we encode proligue and epilogues now for all targets.
--- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-04 14:51 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I think this is really a dup of bug 12990.
>
Sort of, but not quite. 12990 does no cover the exception handling aspects,
but it claims that the problem persists target-independently for
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-02 08:19 ---
I think this is really a dup of bug 12990.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29997
