--- Comment #9 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 04:03 ---
The original reporter seems to have resolved this to their satisfaction in
their CrystalSpace3d bug report. This report was due to running up against a
limitation of the -fPIC implementation.
--
bje at gcc dot gnu d
--- Comment #8 from srm at schokokeks dot org 2007-07-07 13:37 ---
crystalspace also has a bug report for this
(http://www.crystalspace3d.org/trac/CS/ticket/210)
as mentioned there, one could try this
http://www.crystalspace3d.org/trac/CS/ticket/258 which is using a special
branch for t
--- Comment #7 from srm at schokokeks dot org 2007-06-27 08:06 ---
I have checked with 4.2.0 and it produces the same error.
Maybe i'd like to rebuild python too with 4.2?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28904
--- Comment #6 from srm at schokokeks dot org 2007-06-26 20:35 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> They have been improvements in 4.2.0 with respect of having a smaller GOT.
> Can
> you try 4.2.0?
>
uh, i'd like to...give me a few days to figure out how i can do a proper
upgrade or setup
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-26 20:30 ---
They have been improvements in 4.2.0 with respect of having a smaller GOT. Can
you try 4.2.0?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28904
--- Comment #4 from srm at schokokeks dot org 2007-06-26 16:12 ---
the same here on gentoo-ppc-2.6.21, using gcc-4.1.2
Powerbook G4(5,6)
trying to compile Crystalspace v1.2 --with-python
When ommiting -fPIC OR using --without-python, the build works.
I will see if a revert to 4.1.1 bring
--- Comment #3 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2006-09-05 22:50
---
This is a limitation of the -fPIC implementation used on powerpc-linux. You
get a maximum of 64K bytes of GOT entries per function (ie. 16K entries).
-fpic is even more limited, with only 64K bytes of GOT for th
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-31 04:34 ---
well, the syntax would be more like:
addis 9,(.LC42716-.LCTOC1)@ha(30)
lwz 0,.LC42716-.LCTOC1)@l(9)
But I don't know if this syntax will work.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2890
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-31 04:30 ---
Hmm, I am going to go out on a limb and say we should
produce about the following (hopefully I get the right macros):
la temp, ha16(.LC42716-.LCTOC1)(30)
lwz rn, lo16(.LC42716-.LCTOC1)(temp)
This is like what Darwi
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28904
10 matches
Mail list logo
