--- Comment #6 from Martin dot vGagern at gmx dot net 2006-09-22 07:14
---
Comparing this issue here with bug 28686 I noticed that the code of the
functions before the one containing both assembly blocks is completely
irrelevant. So even if you only have one empty function in the DO_SIN
--- Comment #5 from acahalan at gmail dot com 2006-09-22 02:24 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I still don't see why my code should not compile even for register starved
> x86.
> Including the -fomit-frame-pointer optimization should allow using the ebp
> register at least for leaf funct
--- Comment #4 from Martin dot vGagern at gmx dot net 2006-08-07 16:14
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I bet this is not a bug. x86 is known to be very register starved.
Yes, I know that. But this situation does not explain, why adding two more
functions containing the asm statements s
--- Comment #3 from Martin dot vGagern at gmx dot net 2006-08-07 16:02
---
One more observation: I tried adding the flags corresponding to -O1 according
to the info page:
-fdefer-pop -fdelayed-branch -fguess-branch-probability -fcprop-registers
-floop-optimize -fif-conversion -fif-conv
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-07 15:53 ---
I bet this is not a bug. x86 is known to be very register starved.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
