--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-15 18:15
---
No feedback in 3 months so closing as invalid.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-18 05:52
---
> Here is the test case from that bug report:
I gather than compiling with -fPIC and/or calling printstack from a shared
library is necessary to trigger the bug, which is not what you reported. At
this point I'
--- Comment #9 from sebor at roguewave dot com 2006-05-17 21:35 ---
Here's what I learned from Sun:
Here is the test case from that bug report:
[Makefile]
main: main.o libshibby.so
gcc -L. -lshibby -Wl,-R. -o main main.o
main.o: main.c
gcc -c -o main.o main.c
libshib
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 20:40
---
> Maybe it's one of the runtime library functions that's static (maybe _start?).
Excerpt from gcc/config/sparc/sol2-c1.asm:
.section".text"
.proc 022
.global _start
_start:
--- Comment #7 from sebor at roguewave dot com 2006-05-17 18:34 ---
Maybe it's one of the runtime library functions that's static (maybe _start?).
The diff between the two .s files is empty.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27629
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 18:10
---
> I'm told that the fault is due to a known problem in the Sun libc:
> 6372620 printstack() segfaults when called from static function
>
> It this doesn't provide sufficient detail to work around the bug in gcc
--- Comment #5 from sebor at roguewave dot com 2006-05-17 17:43 ---
I'm told that the fault is due to a known problem in the Sun libc:
6372620 printstack() segfaults when called from static function
It this doesn't provide sufficient detail to work around the bug in gcc
(assuming you
--- Comment #4 from sebor at roguewave dot com 2006-05-17 15:12 ---
Here's the verbose output from the compiler driver:
$ gcc -v t.c
Using built-in specs.
Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.9
Configured with: /build/sebor/gcc-4.1.0/configure --enable-languages=c,c++
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-4.1.
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 06:31
---
I cannot reproduce on the SPARC/Solaris 9 machine I use. Please provide as
many details as you can on the OS, the linker, the assembler, GCC, GDB and so
on.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #2 from sebor at roguewave dot com 2006-05-16 17:35 ---
I'm not sure what you find wrong with my "attitude" but yes, I did send Sun a
note about it pointing them to this problem report.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27629
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 17:31 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> If this is due to a Solaris bug it would be great if gcc could work
> around it.
And this attitute is wrong. Did you file this with Sun yet? If not, you
should say the same thing, if thi
11 matches
Mail list logo
