--- Comment #7 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 19:45 ---
Patch committed, so I presume fixed.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-20 02:03 ---
Subject: Bug 27182
Author: kkojima
Date: Thu Apr 20 02:03:47 2006
New Revision: 113110
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113110
Log:
PR target/27182
* config/sh/sh.md (movsicc_tr
--- Comment #5 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-20 01:54 ---
Subject: Bug 27182
Author: kkojima
Date: Thu Apr 20 01:54:20 2006
New Revision: 113109
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113109
Log:
PR target/27182
* config/sh/sh.md (movsicc_tr
--- Comment #4 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-19 22:41 ---
Thanks. I'll commit it with the ChangeLog entry below if the usual
bootstrap/regtest on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu is done successfully.
PR target/27182
* config/sh/sh.md (movsicc_true+3): Tweak conditio
--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-19 19:35 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I'd like to add Joern to the CC list.
>
> I've looked the rtl dumps for the testcase. It seems that
> the wrong code is generated during the peephole2 optimization.
...
> (reg:SI 1 r1 [65
--- Comment #2 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-19 12:42 ---
I'd like to add Joern to the CC list.
I've looked the rtl dumps for the testcase. It seems that
the wrong code is generated during the peephole2 optimization.
The corresponding part of .41.csa dump is:
(insn:HI 12
--- Comment #1 from sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp 2006-04-17 13:19
---
Created an attachment (id=11282)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11282&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27182
