--- Comment #23 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 01:20
---
Fixed in 4.1.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Sta
--- Comment #22 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 01:18
---
Subject: Bug 25603
Author: mmitchel
Date: Fri Feb 24 01:18:27 2006
New Revision: 111409
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111409
Log:
Backport:
2006-02-16 Denis Nagorny <[EMA
--- Comment #21 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-22 22:51
---
Set back to P3 so that I will be sure to reconsider it.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #20 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-22 17:04 ---
I don't want to see this patch hold up 4.1.0 release. I will ask it be
applied to the 4.1 branch when it is open. But it is Mark's call.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25603
--- Comment #19 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-22 16:59 ---
Subject: Bug 25603
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Feb 22 16:59:45 2006
New Revision: 111365
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111365
Log:
2006-02-22 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR target/25603
--- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-22 16:30
---
As this is a wrong-code regression for 4.1 (albeit on ia64-linux), Mark should
re-consider the priority and maybe allow this patch in. And the patch
submitter should have asked for that in the first place (and can
--- Comment #17 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-20 17:46 ---
A testcase patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01391.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25603
