[Bug target/25259] bootstrap failures on non-C99 platforms

2005-12-21 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-21 20:26 --- > This might be the last one... Victory! sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1 is alive again. :-) Thanks a lot. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25259

[Bug target/25259] bootstrap failures on non-C99 platforms

2005-12-21 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2005-12-21 08:25 --- Created an attachment (id=10541) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10541&action=view) fix pasto in int16_t definition This might be the last one... -- bonzini at gnu dot org changed: What

[Bug target/25259] bootstrap failures on non-C99 platforms

2005-12-20 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-20 17:29 --- > Created an attachment (id=10535) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10535&action=view) [edit] > fix the #ifndef -> use #ifdef instead Much better! However: stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/opt/build

[Bug target/25259] bootstrap failures on non-C99 platforms

2005-12-20 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2005-12-20 14:15 --- Created an attachment (id=10535) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10535&action=view) fix the #ifndef -> use #ifdef instead -- bonzini at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug target/25259] bootstrap failures on non-C99 platforms

2005-12-17 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-18 07:17 --- > This one includes the change to the usage of __extension__ that Andrew pointed > out. In file included from /home/eric/svn/gcc/libdecnumber/decContext.h:43, from /home/eric/svn/gcc/libdecnumber

[Bug target/25259] bootstrap failures on non-C99 platforms

2005-12-15 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2005-12-15 14:43 --- Created an attachment (id=10496) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10496&action=view) one more update This one includes the change to the usage of __extension__ that Andrew pointed out. -- bonzini at g

[Bug target/25259] bootstrap failures on non-C99 platforms

2005-12-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 20:46 --- (In reply to comment #5) > > You have to do "aclocal -I ../config", or you can configure with > > --enable-maintainer-mode. > > Ah, thanks. It fails very early though:> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> cat t.c > typedef __ext

[Bug target/25259] bootstrap failures on non-C99 platforms

2005-12-07 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 11:31 --- > You have to do "aclocal -I ../config", or you can configure with > --enable-maintainer-mode. Ah, thanks. It fails very early though: In file included from /home/eric/svn/gcc/libdecnumber/decContext.h:43,

[Bug target/25259] bootstrap failures on non-C99 platforms

2005-12-07 Thread paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch 2005-12-07 10:52 --- Subject: Re: bootstrap failures on non-C99 platforms >>I bootstrapped this on i686-pc-linux-gnu, all languages. Eric, can you test >>it on a non-C99 platform? >> >> >I don't seem to be able to rege

[Bug target/25259] bootstrap failures on non-C99 platforms

2005-12-07 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 08:29 --- > I bootstrapped this on i686-pc-linux-gnu, all languages. Eric, can you test > it on a non-C99 platform? I don't seem to be able to regenerate aclocal.m4 and configure correctly, so the new test GCC_HEADER_STDI

[Bug target/25259] bootstrap failures on non-C99 platforms

2005-12-06 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2005-12-06 12:28 --- Created an attachment (id=10417) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10417&action=view) proposed patch I bootstrapped this on i686-pc-linux-gnu, all languages. Eric, can you test it on a non-C99 platform?

[Bug target/25259] bootstrap failures on non-C99 platforms

2005-12-05 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2005-12-05 09:09 --- Created an attachment (id=10406) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10406&action=view) patch sketch A very experimental (not even built, let alone bootstrapped/regtested) patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bu

[Bug target/25259] bootstrap failures on non-C99 platforms

2005-12-05 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
-- bonzini at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|paolo dot bonzini at lu dot |bonzini at gnu dot org |unisi dot ch|