[Bug target/24466] uprgading of gcc

2006-02-26 Thread basavaraja_g at mindtree dot com
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 1:34 AM To: Basavaraja G. Subject: [Bug target/24466] uprgading of gcc --- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-26 20:04 --- No feedback in three months. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What

[Bug target/24466] uprgading of gcc

2006-02-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-26 20:04 --- No feedback in three months. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/24466] uprgading of gcc

2005-11-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 05:26 --- *** Bug 24563 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24466

[Bug target/24466] uprgading of gcc

2005-10-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-23 22:49 --- As I asked, what happens if you build using "make bootstrap" instead of just doing "make all-gcc". I am thinking the GCC version you already have install, 2.95 is creating wrong code which is what make bootstrap is

[Bug target/24466] uprgading of gcc

2005-10-20 Thread basavaraja_g at mindtree dot com
--- Comment #2 from basavaraja_g at mindtree dot com 2005-10-21 04:51 --- (In reply to comment #1) > So does this happen when you build gcc with "make boostrap" instead of "make > all". > > Also please follow the instructions on the web site for installing gcc. > We have given the co

[Bug target/24466] uprgading of gcc

2005-10-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 04:37 --- So does this happen when you build gcc with "make boostrap" instead of "make all". Also please follow the instructions on the web site for installing gcc. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: W