[Bug target/24193] [4.1 Regression] ICE in extract_insn while compiling libgfortran

2005-10-07 Thread wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-07 19:58 --- Fixed on mainline. -- wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Statu

[Bug target/24193] [4.1 Regression] ICE in extract_insn while compiling libgfortran

2005-10-07 Thread wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-07 19:57 --- Mine. IA-64. -- wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|una

[Bug target/24193] [4.1 Regression] ICE in extract_insn while compiling libgfortran

2005-10-07 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-07 19:27 --- Subject: Bug 24193 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-07 19:27:37 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/ia64: ia64.md

[Bug target/24193] [4.1 Regression] ICE in extract_insn while compiling libgfortran

2005-10-06 Thread wilson at tuliptree dot org
--- Comment #8 from wilson at tuliptree dot org 2005-10-06 21:21 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE in extract_insn while compiling libgfortran On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 14:02, sje at cup dot hp dot com wrote: > --- Comment #7 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2005-10-06 21:02

[Bug target/24193] [4.1 Regression] ICE in extract_insn while compiling libgfortran

2005-10-06 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #7 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2005-10-06 21:02 --- I haven't done a full build/test but I did verify that changing operand 0 of movti_internal from general_operand to destination_operand fixed this failure. I was wondering if operand 1 should be changed from general_opera

[Bug target/24193] [4.1 Regression] ICE in extract_insn while compiling libgfortran

2005-10-06 Thread wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-06 17:41 --- Loads can have post_increment addresses with an immediate or register increment. Stores can have post_increment address with only an immediate increment. We have a special predicate, destination_operand, that checks

[Bug target/24193] [4.1 Regression] ICE in extract_insn while compiling libgfortran

2005-10-06 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Comment #5 from schwab at suse dot de 2005-10-06 16:04 --- *** Bug 24240 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- schwab at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/24193] [4.1 Regression] ICE in extract_insn while compiling libgfortran

2005-10-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-04 18:17 --- Confirmed, reduced testcase: void g (__int128_t *dest, long dstride, long rank) { long n; for (n = 0; n < rank; n++) dest[n * dstride] = 1; } So TImode is fully supported on ia64. -- pinskia at gcc dot

[Bug target/24193] [4.1 Regression] ICE in extract_insn while compiling libgfortran

2005-10-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-04 18:09 --- Reducing. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24193

[Bug target/24193] [4.1 Regression] ICE in extract_insn while compiling libgfortran

2005-10-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-04 17:29 --- Even though it is a latent bug, this causes a build failure, therefor it is a considered a regression. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --