--- Comment #18 from h dot m dot brand at xs4all dot nl 2005-10-11 14:52
---
Subject: Re: gcc-4.x fails to build on AIX 5.2.0.0-ML04
On 11 Oct 2005 14:37:31 -, "h dot m dot brand at xs4all dot nl"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ignore the AIX 4.3 question: I've raised the limits to u
--- Comment #17 from h dot m dot brand at xs4all dot nl 2005-10-11 14:37
---
Subject: Re: gcc-4.x fails to build on AIX 5.2.0.0-ML04
On 6 Oct 2005 17:24:10 -, "dje at gcc dot gnu dot org"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now that all seems to be in more or less working order, and gcc-4
--- Comment #16 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-06 17:24 ---
I do not know where the extra -B is entering, but GCC configure and build
process does not insert it. You might look for it in other environment
variables, if it still exists after you have deleted the build directory.
--- Comment #15 from dje at watson dot ibm dot com 2005-10-06 14:07 ---
Subject: Re: gcc-4.x fails to build on AIX 5.2.0.0-ML04
The -Wl,-bbigtoc fix has been committed to GCC 4.1 sources.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24119
--- Comment #14 from h dot m dot brand at xs4all dot nl 2005-10-06 14:04
---
Subject: Re: gcc-4.x fails to build on AIX 5.2.0.0-ML04
On 6 Oct 2005 13:30:56 -, "dje at watson dot ibm dot com"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #13 from dje at watson dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #13 from dje at watson dot ibm dot com 2005-10-06 13:30 ---
Subject: Re: gcc-4.x fails to build on AIX 5.2.0.0-ML04
> That worked. But I still saw the -B added to all the lines, but now that
> that folder is not there, all goes smooth
> As you can see: *I* did not put any
--- Comment #12 from h dot m dot brand at xs4all dot nl 2005-10-06 08:44
---
Subject: Re: gcc-4.x fails to build on AIX 5.2.0.0-ML04
On 6 Oct 2005 06:33:16 -, "h dot m dot brand at xs4all dot nl"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Comment #11 from h dot m dot brand at xs4all do
--- Comment #11 from h dot m dot brand at xs4all dot nl 2005-10-06 06:33
---
Subject: Re: gcc-4.x fails to build on AIX 5.2.0.0-ML04
On 6 Oct 2005 04:30:37 -, "dje at gcc dot gnu dot org"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Comment #10 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-06
--- Comment #10 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-06 04:30 ---
You say: "I re-ran without -B", but the Make output clearly shows the command
still present:
CC_FOR_BUILD=" stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/
-B/usr/local/ppc64/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/bin/"
The configuration process remembers the
--- Comment #9 from dje at watson dot ibm dot com 2005-10-04 19:24 ---
Subject: Re: gcc-4.x fails to build on AIX 5.2.0.0-ML04
I bootstrap GCC every day without seeing this problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24119
--- Comment #8 from h dot m dot brand at xs4all dot nl 2005-10-04 19:13
---
Subject: Re: gcc-4.x fails to build on AIX 5.2.0.0-ML04
On 4 Oct 2005 15:00:17 -, "dje at watson dot ibm dot com"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #7 from dje at watson dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #7 from dje at watson dot ibm dot com 2005-10-04 15:00 ---
Subject: Re: gcc-4.x fails to build on AIX 5.2.0.0-ML04
> h dot m dot brand at xs4all dot nl writes:
h> Next step is to upgrade vac-6.0.0.11 to vac-7.0.0.3
You said that you are bootstrapping with GCC
--- Comment #6 from h dot m dot brand at xs4all dot nl 2005-10-04 14:24
---
Subject: Re: gcc-4.x fails to build on AIX 5.2.0.0-ML04
On 2 Oct 2005 13:23:41 -, "h dot m dot brand at xs4all dot nl"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Comment #5 from h dot m dot brand at xs4all dot
--- Comment #5 from h dot m dot brand at xs4all dot nl 2005-10-02 13:23
---
Subject: Re: gcc-4.x fails to build on AIX 5.2.0.0-ML04
On 2 Oct 2005 04:45:37 -, "dje at gcc dot gnu dot org"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Comment #4 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-02 0
--- Comment #4 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-02 04:45 ---
Also, why are you adding "--with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld" to the configure command?
There should be only one "ld" on the system and the GCC configuration process
should find it automatically? Do you have GNU Binutils instal
--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-01 16:00
---
Either GCC is installed or not. If it's installed, you should not need any -B
options.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24119
--- Additional Comments From h dot m dot brand at xs4all dot nl 2005-09-30
18:06 ---
Subject: Re: gcc-4.x fails to build on AIX 5.2.0.0-ML04
On 30 Sep 2005 16:23:07 -, "dje at gcc dot gnu dot org"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu
--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-30 16:23
---
Yes, GCC 4.1 needs -Wl,-bbigtoc, but what is "-B/usr/local/ppc64/bin" for? Once
you do something like that, it's an unsupported build.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24119
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
Keywords||build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2411
19 matches
Mail list logo
