[Bug target/23188] [4.1 Regression] vect-reduc-* fail

2005-10-06 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #5 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2005-10-06 21:55 --- These failures are fixed now with the patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg00221.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg00110.html -- sje at cup dot hp dot com changed: What

[Bug target/23188] [4.1 Regression] vect-reduc-* fail

2005-09-25 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-25 11:30 --- As shown at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg01138.html these failures are still present on mainline. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23188

[Bug target/23188] [4.1 Regression] vect-reduc-* fail

2005-09-18 Thread dorit at il dot ibm dot com
--- Additional Comments From dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2005-09-19 06:52 --- do these ia64 reduction testcase failures still occur? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23188

[Bug target/23188] [4.1 Regression] vect-reduc-* fail

2005-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-08 18:52 --- These might get fixed by: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-08/msg00401.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23188

[Bug target/23188] [4.1 Regression] vect-reduc-* fail

2005-08-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-06 06:44 --- Hmm, I think this was exposed by: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg02041.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg02043.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg02037.html Whic