[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2006-11-30 Thread chaoyingfu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #29 from chaoyingfu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-30 19:25 --- Subject: Bug 23067 Author: chaoyingfu Date: Thu Nov 30 19:24:37 2006 New Revision: 119373 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119373 Log: Merged revisions 118337-118377 via svnmerge from svn

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2006-10-31 Thread geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #28 from geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-01 05:39 --- All these testcases are now fixed. I don't promise that the two compilers have exactly the same ABI, especially for C++, but the testcases pass. -- geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Rem

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2006-10-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #27 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-01 05:33 --- I think this patch just broke structs with vectors in them. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23067

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2006-10-31 Thread geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #26 from geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-01 05:28 --- Subject: Bug 23067 Author: geoffk Date: Wed Nov 1 05:28:41 2006 New Revision: 118365 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118365 Log: In gcc/: PR 23067 * c-decl.c (start_struct): D

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2006-10-16 Thread geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23067

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2006-10-16 Thread geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2006-10-16 Thread geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #25 from geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 21:46 --- *** Bug 25630 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-12-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #24 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-31 22:21 --- /* { dg-require-effective-target ilp32 } */ That is required for the testcases by the way to make sure that they are only run on the 32bit powerpc-darwin. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23067

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-12-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #23 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-14 20:10 --- (In reply to comment #22) > struct a{long long t; int i;}; > struct f{int tt; struct a d; int t;}; This one is still wrong after the (updated) patch in comment #20. The size which Apple's GCC gives is 24 but the

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #22 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-14 02:50 --- Here is a couple more structs which FSF's GCC gets wrong: struct f{int c; struct {long long t;}; d;}; --- struct a{int tt; long long t; int i;}; struct f{int tt; struct a d; int t;}; struct a{long long t; int

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-10-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #21 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-06 18:40 --- Libffi's failure info from Andreas T.: The chunk form ffi_darwin.c has to be applied three times. Attached. Although, with this modification I get a fail but it looks much better. andreast% ./nested_struct3.exe

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-10-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #20 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-06 18:37 --- I give up, 3 days no luck at getting this correct. The current patch follows: Index: src/powerpc/ffi_darwin.c === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/libffi/src/p

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-10-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #19 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-05 15:21 --- (In reply to comment #18) > This is because libffi gets the alignment wrong. I have to look into libffi's > code. And I have a fix for that too. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23067

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-10-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-05 15:06 --- The patch causes the following failures: FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct3.c execution test This is because libffi gets the alignment wrong. I have to look into libffi's code. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-10-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-04 19:49 --- Need to retest, I was compiling with a bad version of 4.1 which causes us to fail with some varargs. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23067

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-10-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-04 03:05 --- Created an attachment (id=9867) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9867&action=view) Patch which I am testing This is the correct version of your patch which does not effect AIX or PPC64-linux (wi

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-10-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-04 02:43 --- I am going to fix this tonight. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-07-27 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-27 15:48 --- The AIX and PowerOpen ABIs specify doubleword alignment for long long ints in 32-bit mode and FSF GCC always has implemented this for all AIX-derived ABIs. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2306

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-07-26 Thread sabre at nondot dot org
--- Additional Comments From sabre at nondot dot org 2005-07-26 17:46 --- Corrected patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg01736.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23067

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-07-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 17:42 --- Also the patch needs a testcase or two. For an example: /* { dg-do compile { powerpc*-darwin* } } */ struct f { long long ll; int i; }; int f[sizeof(struct f)!=16?-1:1]; --- /* { dg-do compile { po

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-07-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 17:37 --- Patch does not get the following correct: struct f { long long i; int j; }; -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23067

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-07-26 Thread sabre at nondot dot org
--- Additional Comments From sabre at nondot dot org 2005-07-26 17:35 --- Potential patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg01732.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23067

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-07-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 13:14 --- Confirmed based on what Apple's GCC does and what Geoff said. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-07-25 Thread sabre at nondot dot org
--- Additional Comments From sabre at nondot dot org 2005-07-26 04:49 --- The ABI clearly states that the maximum alignment for non-initial structure elements is 32-bits. -Chris -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23067

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-07-25 Thread geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 03:17 --- Doesn't matter if the printed docs differ; Apple's GCC sets the ABI for Darwin. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23067

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-07-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 02:36 --- Looks like the ABI in darwin.h is just a copy of the one in aix.h which might mean this was on purpose and Apple's GCC is wrong. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23067

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-07-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 02:32 --- The comment in darwin.h seems to contradict what is here: /* Darwin word-aligns FP doubles but doubleword-aligns 64-bit ints. */ /* Darwin increases natural record alignment to doubleword if the first fi

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-07-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 02:29 --- The ABI is here: http://developer.apple.com/documentation/DeveloperTools/Conceptual/PowerPCRuntime/Data/ chapter_2_section_3.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40001520-CH210-BCIFEEFG -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-07-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 02:27 --- FSF's gcc has always got this wrong. Apple's 3.3 gcc got this right. I don't know what is correct or not. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-07-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 02:15 --- Not a regression in FSF's gcc. -- What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug target/23067] Incorrect struct layout on darwin

2005-07-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 02:07 --- I don't think the ABI says this. I think it only mentions double. -- What|Removed |Added