[Bug target/22049] M68K Coldfire: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2006-05-08 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 15:55 --- Not reproducible on mainline. -- kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/22049] M68K Coldfire: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2005-08-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.1.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22049

[Bug target/22049] M68K Coldfire: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2005-06-13 Thread jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org
--- Additional Comments From jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org 2005-06-13 15:01 --- Oh, one more thing. The original version of the code, ICE'd on a slightly different constraint: (insn 1533 4485 1534 187 /home/jlarmour/ecos/ecospro-common-040929-branch/packages/net/snmp/lib/current/src/p

[Bug target/22049] M68K Coldfire: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2005-06-13 Thread jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org
--- Additional Comments From jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org 2005-06-13 14:48 --- Oh, one interesting aspect is that the failure is even dependent on some of the numbers in the switch statement. For example, if the penultimate number is 105 instead of 106 it compiles okay. --

[Bug target/22049] M68K Coldfire: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2005-06-13 Thread jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org
--- Additional Comments From jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org 2005-06-13 14:38 --- Created an attachment (id=9080) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9080&action=view) Stripped down source file to reproduce problem Compile with: m68k-elf-gcc -c -m5200 -O1 -funit-at-a-ti