[Bug target/21079] avr-gcc lacks support for builtin ffs function

2005-10-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-18 22:46 --- So closing as fixed then. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/21079] avr-gcc lacks support for builtin ffs function

2005-10-18 Thread aesok at pautinka dot net
--- Comment #4 from aesok at pautinka dot net 2005-10-18 22:44 --- Functions 'ffs', 'ffsl' and 'ffsll' are added in avr-libc library. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21079

[Bug target/21079] avr-gcc lacks support for builtin ffs function

2005-04-19 Thread ericw at evcohs dot com
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-04-19 15:49 --- Björn, That sounds like a reasonable approach. Submit a bug report to the avr-libc project on Savannah: Eric -- What|Removed |A

[Bug target/21079] avr-gcc lacks support for builtin ffs function

2005-04-17 Thread bjoern dot m dot haase at web dot de
--- Additional Comments From bjoern dot m dot haase at web dot de 2005-04-17 23:07 --- So probably the best thing to do now would probably be to 1.) mark the test cases as xfail and 2.) write an enhancement request for avr-libc.? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210

[Bug target/21079] avr-gcc lacks support for builtin ffs function

2005-04-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17 22:45 --- ffs is a POSIX function which almost all libc provides. So if there is no fall back function, there is nothing which GCC can do. Does avr have instructions which could be used to implement this if so it sh