[Bug target/20199] -fvisibility-inlines-hidden broken on powerpc64-linux

2005-04-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20199

[Bug target/20199] -fvisibility-inlines-hidden broken on powerpc64-linux

2005-03-25 Thread aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-26 06:31 --- Close as suggested -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVE

[Bug target/20199] -fvisibility-inlines-hidden broken on powerpc64-linux

2005-03-25 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-25 22:21 --- This works with today's 4.0-branch sources, with small test cases and also with eon built with this option. I haven't checked to see when it was fixed, but this PR can now be closed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug target/20199] -fvisibility-inlines-hidden broken on powerpc64-linux

2005-02-25 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-26 00:15 --- My command line in the previous comment should have said "-o libx.so". -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20199

[Bug target/20199] -fvisibility-inlines-hidden broken on powerpc64-linux

2005-02-25 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 23:53 --- Ah, yes. I haven't come up with a testcase that doesn't use libstdc++, but the following testcase fails without the patch referenced in comment #28 and passes with it:

[Bug target/20199] -fvisibility-inlines-hidden broken on powerpc64-linux

2005-02-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 19:00 --- I think this is the same as PR 19664. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20199