--- Additional Comments From commie1 at gmx dot net 2005-03-21 16:33
---
Alright, sorry again. I didn't use the right pr14981 testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20051
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-03-21 13:15
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I'm sorry Uros, but PR1901 was fixed three months ago; I reduced this testcase
> with the latest 3.4 snapshot (20050318). I checked the testcase in PR14981,
> and
> that one indeed doesn
--- Additional Comments From commie1 at gmx dot net 2005-03-21 11:03
---
I'm sorry Uros, but PR1901 was fixed three months ago; I reduced this testcase
with the latest 3.4 snapshot (20050318). I checked the testcase in PR14981, and
that one indeed doesn't cause an ICE anymore. It can't b
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-03-21 06:20
---
This is a duplicate of PR 14981. The fix is in a follow-up bug PR 19010.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 14981 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From commie1 at gmx dot net 2005-03-20 02:08
---
Testacse reduces to:
==
void SSEFunc(float* pDataIn)
{
float __attribute__ ((__mode__(__V4SF__))) accum;
accum = __builtin_ia32_xorps(accum,accum);
__builtin_ia32_storeaps(pDataIn, ac
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |target
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
