[Bug target/19019] GCC ldouble format incompatibility with XLC long double

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-08 20:37 --- Fixed in 3.4.4 and above. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/19019] GCC ldouble format incompatibility with XLC long double

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 16:42 --- Subject: Bug 19019 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-25 16:42:01 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug target/19019] GCC ldouble format incompatibility with XLC long double

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 21:33 --- Subject: Bug 19019 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-24 21:33:05 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog mklibgcc.in gcc/co

[Bug target/19019] GCC ldouble format incompatibility with XLC long double

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 09:27 --- Subject: Bug 19019 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-24 09:27:01 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug target/19019] GCC ldouble format incompatibility with XLC long double

--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 10:21 --- That's not possible, the .symver directives must be in the same source as defines the symbols in the first operands of .symver. The following patch works for me in 3.4:

[Bug target/19019] GCC ldouble format incompatibility with XLC long double

--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-22 22:52 --- We could skip the versioned old symbols completely, although providing those symbols probably is more important in GCC 3.4 than in GCC 4.0. Should we place the directives in a separate file only included in the

[Bug target/19019] GCC ldouble format incompatibility with XLC long double

--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-22 22:38 --- The 3.4 backport doesn't seem to work for me at all. The problem is the .hidden .oS generation that dies on the .symvers in darwin-ldouble.o that is going to be included in libgcc_eh.a. ( ` if [ -f ./nm ] ; t

[Bug target/19019] GCC ldouble format incompatibility with XLC long double

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-17 00:34 --- Subject: Bug 19019 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-17 00:34:42 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug target/19019] GCC ldouble format incompatibility with XLC long double

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-17 00:32 --- Subject: Bug 19019 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: apple-ppc-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-17 00:32:08 Modified files: gcc: Chan

[Bug target/19019] GCC ldouble format incompatibility with XLC long double

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-17 00:16 --- Subject: Bug 19019 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-17 00:16:11 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/rs6000:

[Bug target/19019] GCC ldouble format incompatibility with XLC long double

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-15 23:17 --- Subject: Bug 19019 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-15 23:16:49 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/rs6000:

[Bug target/19019] GCC ldouble format incompatibility with XLC long double

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-14 20:21 --- Subject: Bug 19019 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-14 20:21:13 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/rs6000:

[Bug target/19019] GCC ldouble format incompatibility with XLC long double

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-13 21:31 --- Subject: Bug 19019 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-13 21:31:37 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/rs6000:

[Bug target/19019] GCC ldouble format incompatibility with XLC long double

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-16 23:41 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E