[Bug target/18065] wrong built-in functions selected

2004-10-19 Thread schlie at comcast dot net
tible, minimally explicitly and ideally when type compatible? -paul- > From: schlie at comcast dot net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 19 Oct 2004 21:18:17 - > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Bug target/18065] wrong built-in functio

[Bug target/18065] wrong built-in functions selected

2004-10-19 Thread schlie at comcast dot net
even if properly explicitly cast. Thanks, -paul- > From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 19 Oct 2004 20:39:44 - > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Bug target/18065] wrong built-in functions selected

[Bug target/18065] wrong built-in functions selected

2004-10-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-19 20:39 --- char ss = s % s ; //<__divmodhi4> wrong, should be 8-bit <__divmodqi4> This is not wrong as we sign extend the arguments as required by the C standard (to int). So this is just an missed-optimization.