https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120933
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120933
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #3)
> Yes, compatibility with old glibc is a concern, considering this can be
> difficult to test, and failures can be largely silent.
What are your suggestions?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120933
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120933
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120933
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
This should be opt-in since it requires glibc fix
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31372
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120933
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill