https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119583
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, generally -fomit-frame-pointer doesn't guarantee that the frame pointer
is omitted:
"Omit the frame pointer in functions that don't need one."
Functions using VLAs/alloca or requiring dynamic stack rea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119583
--- Comment #5 from Siddhesh Poyarekar ---
Appeared since r15-3078-g6ea25c041964bf which was also backported to the gcc14
branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119583
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119583
--- Comment #3 from Siddhesh Poyarekar ---
I'm not so sure, the stack is correctly aligned here, just that it happens a
little too late and results in holding on to the frame pointer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119583
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|X86_64 |x86-64
--- Comment #1 from Siddhes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119583
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
