https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118957
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118957
--- Comment #6 from Filip Kastl ---
I've measured this again. I used -O2 -march=generic -flto PGO on an AMD Zen4
machine.
Between
r15-7400-gd3ff498c478ace
r15-7852-ge836d80374aa03
the slowdown disappears. So, as with pr118959, I think the i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118957
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118957
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118957
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 Regression] 5-9%|[15 Regression] 5-9%
|s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118957
--- Comment #3 from Filip Kastl ---
> this isn't a regression
Huh, I apparently got confused. The graph shows that this *is* a regression.
Thanks, richi, for fixing the bug title.