https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114839
--- Comment #4 from Ed Maste ---
Thanks - 54568 adds some good context. Based on that I think it may that frame
registration calls are not present in the FreeBSD crt bits used for static
binaries, which could explain the differences in OSes.
We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114839
--- Comment #3 from Ed Maste ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Is it the case that unwinder from LLVM needs a .eh_frame_hdr for static
> binaries while GCC's libgcc one does not?
That's possible, but in the investigation in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114839
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm, I wonder why freebsd needs to be different from every most other targets
though here:
```
config/alpha/elf.h:#define LINK_EH_SPEC "%{!static|static-pie:--eh-frame-hdr} "
config/arc/linux.h:#define LINK_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114839
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>From gcc/config/freebsd.h:
#if defined(HAVE_LD_EH_FRAME_HDR)
#define LINK_EH_SPEC "%{!static|static-pie:--eh-frame-hdr} "
#endif
The !static part comes from r0-95899-g2208d2ac9546de .
