https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114272
Richard Ball changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114272
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Ball
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:751a0f54345b7e037db7f0389c19c1f87e0ae4de
commit r12-10397-g751a0f54345b7e037db7f0389c19c1f87e0ae4de
Author: Richard Ball
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114272
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Ball
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:28b3b8a2fe55521a43f3710cf6ced1ab63f1ea03
commit r13-8654-g28b3b8a2fe55521a43f3710cf6ced1ab63f1ea03
Author: Richard Ball
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114272
--- Comment #4 from Richard Ball ---
Fixed on Trunk so far
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114272
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Ball :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cab53aae43cf94171b01320c08302e47a5daa391
commit r14-9672-gcab53aae43cf94171b01320c08302e47a5daa391
Author: Richard Ball
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114272
--- Comment #2 from Richard Ball ---
Bad wording on my part there, apologies. You're correct, not incorrect perhaps
sub-optimal is a better wording.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114272
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Ball from comment #0)
> The SCHEDULER_IDENT for these two CPUs was incorrectly
> set to cortexa55, which is incorrect. This can cause
> incorrect asm to be generated.
SCHEDULER_IDENT wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114272
Richard Ball changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-03-07
Ever confirmed|0
