https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #7)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #6)
> > I suggest we switch m68k to LRA, so we can close this bug report. Plus file
> > bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
--- Comment #9 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #8)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #7)
> > I will verify now that the M2 issue is related to enabling LRA.
>
> The M2 i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
--- Comment #10 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #9)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #8)
> > (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #7)
> > > I will verify
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
--- Comment #8 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #7)
> I will verify now that the M2 issue is related to enabling LRA.
The M2 issue is indeed related to LRA. Will test Fortran now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
--- Comment #7 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #6)
> I suggest we switch m68k to LRA, so we can close this bug report. Plus file
> bug reports for the issues with M2, Fortran and JIT.
JIT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
--- Comment #6 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5)
> So the m68k bootstrap with LRA enabled blows up. It looks like the stage1
> compiler is mis-compiling the stage2 compiler. The result is a metric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So the m68k bootstrap with LRA enabled blows up. It looks like the stage1
compiler is mis-compiling the stage2 compiler. The result is a metric ton of
errors building the stage2 libgcc.
A .o bisection la
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Spinning. Should have some results tomorrow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
The testsuite is clean now, so a boostrap test would be useful.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Andreas, do you think the m68k port is ready to try bootstrapping with LRA
enabled by default? It'd be relatively simple to flip it in my tester.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
Bug 113939 depends on bug 116413, which changed state.
Bug 116413 Summary: [LRA] [M68K] ICE: unrecognized insn in
lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.cc:1036
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116413
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
Bug 113939 depends on bug 116429, which changed state.
Bug 116429 Summary: [LRA] [M86k] Wrong spill offset
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116429
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
Bug 113939 depends on bug 116374, which changed state.
Bug 116374 Summary: [LRA] [M68K] Wrong %argptr elimination
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116374
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andreas Schwab :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4971bae71cf4d6bb0b458dd9d457ec57d14a4f4
commit r15-3028-gc4971bae71cf4d6bb0b458dd9d457ec57d14a4f4
Author: Andreas Schwab
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
Bug 113939 depends on bug 116236, which changed state.
Bug 116236 Summary: [LRA] [M68K] ICE insn does not satisfy its constraints
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116236
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
16 matches
Mail list logo
