https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113282
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113282
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Patrick O'N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113282
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note -fno-strict-aliasing will allow the code to work the way you want it to
work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113282
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
> On x86 this problem
Yes x86 does not enable the scheduler before ra and has less registers so the
scheduler is not as aggressive as on the other targets.
Note this is standard strict aliasing issue even.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113282
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Keywords|