https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113023
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab ---
If the linker relaxation does not remove a relaxable move then it is a bug in
the linker.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113023
--- Comment #4 from Iain Finlay ---
GCC does know that it needs LANCHOR0 and LANCHOR0+4 (meaning a difference of
4). The 12-bit lower portion can be provided in the load and store commands. It
seems just an implementation choice in pcnt0 that it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113023
--- Comment #3 from Iain Finlay ---
It does not get removed. It ends up in the final image. It is also redundant
because load and store can also add a 12 bit signed offset.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113023
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
The insn is _not_ redundant, there is a relocation on it. The linker
relaxation will eventually remove it when it becomes unnessessary.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113023
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
