https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500
Luke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500
--- Comment #7 from Luke ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> > This is most likely a dup of bug 104773.
>
> Or of bug 3507.
i concur...
but i do not know which one to choose...
they b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500
Bug 111500 depends on bug 111581, which changed state.
Bug 111581 Summary: [arm-none-eabi-gcc] / suboptimal optimization / uxth/sxth
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111581
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> This is most likely a dup of bug 104773.
Or of bug 3507.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Luke from comment #4)
> the a.i file for example #1a is:
> # 1 "a.c"
> # 1 "/tmp//"
> # 1 ""
> # 1 ""
> # 1 "a.c"
> void artiSUBS() {
> for (int i=100; i>0; i--)
> *(volatile int*)0xE000E014
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500
Bug 111500 depends on bug 111582, which changed state.
Bug 111582 Summary: [arm-none-eabi-gcc] / suboptimal optimization / bitfield /
superfluous stack write
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111582
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500
Bug 111500 depends on bug 111580, which changed state.
Bug 111580 Summary: [arm-none-eabi-gcc] / suboptimal optimization / b.n to bx lr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111580
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500
--- Comment #4 from Luke ---
the a.i file for example #1a is:
# 1 "a.c"
# 1 "/tmp//"
# 1 ""
# 1 ""
# 1 "a.c"
void artiSUBS() {
for (int i=100; i>0; i--)
*(volatile int*)0xE000E014 = i;
}
the command-line was:
> arm-none-eabi-gcc -save-temps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500
--- Comment #3 from Luke ---
maybe i should also say the "-v" output?
> arm-none-eabi-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=arm-none-eabi-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/9.3.0/lto-wrapper
Target: arm-none-eabi
Configured wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500
--- Comment #2 from Luke ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Can you attach (compilible) examples code for each issue? Really these
> should be filed seperately too.
do u mean, i should file 3 further bug reports?
i try examples
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
Status|UNCONFIRMED
11 matches
Mail list logo
