https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109964
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109964
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) ---
looks good to me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109964
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
I think this has been fixed now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109964
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
This now hits PR110838.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109964
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> So the bug in the vectorizer is that it does
>
> t.ii:14:5: note: can narrow to signed:16 without loss of precision: _31 =
> 1 >> _30;
> t.ii:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109964
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
So the bug in the vectorizer is that it does
t.ii:14:5: note: can narrow to signed:16 without loss of precision: _31 = 1
>> _30;
t.ii:14:5: note: only the low 16 bits of _30 are significant
while that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109964
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109964
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-05-25
Ever confirmed|0
