https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109499
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109499
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3)
> AVX512 masking allows merge and zero modes, zero being cheaper
> (obviously). I think "zero" is what all targets support so we could
> defin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109499
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 13 Apr 2023, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109499
>
> --- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
> ---
> (In reply to Richard B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109499
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Is there not enough info to catch this on the RTL level with a peephole?
That works for simple cases like the first loop. But in general, I thin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109499
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Is there not enough info to catch this on the RTL level with a peephole?
