[Bug target/107957] [AVR] Missed optimization in access to upper-half of a variable

2024-12-05 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107957 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/107957] [AVR] Missed optimization in access to upper-half of a variable

2024-12-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107957 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf6f77edd625cfe2f2f164e90437df318b96527f commit r15-5938-gbf6f77edd625cfe2f2f164e90437df318b96527f Author: Georg-Johann Lay Dat

[Bug target/107957] [AVR] Missed optimization in access to upper-half of a variable

2024-12-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107957 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b78c0dcb1b6b523880ee193698defca3ebd0b3f7 commit r15-5937-gb78c0dcb1b6b523880ee193698defca3ebd0b3f7 Author: Georg-Johann Lay Dat

[Bug target/107957] [AVR] Missed optimization in access to upper-half of a variable

2022-12-05 Thread mrjjot at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107957 --- Comment #1 from Jacek Wieczorek --- A little correction - I just noticed my mistake. Assembly for rawr() is in fact correct. Apparently this happens only for variables longer than 16 bits.