https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105778
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105778
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105778
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dcfdd2851b297e0005a8490b7f867ca45d1ad340
commit r13-927-gdcfdd2851b297e0005a8490b7f867ca45d1ad340
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105778
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> It is the same thing done a few lines later in the preexisting code too.
> Shall I all of those change to gen_lowpart (QImode, force_reg (GET_MODE
> (operands[2]),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105778
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #53058|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105778
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It is the same thing done a few lines later in the preexisting code too.
Shall I all of those change to gen_lowpart (QImode, force_reg (GET_MODE
(operands[2]), operands[2])) then?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105778
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Comment on attachment 53058
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53058
gcc13-pr105778.patch
>+ operands[2] = gen_lowpart (QImode, operands[2]);
We have learned that pre-reload splits nee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105778
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105778
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
