https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104455
--- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #4)
>
> So stepping back to 10,000 feet, we now need to specify options and ISA's we
> are not using. That seems like a bug to me. I'm not sure I would consider
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104455
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104455
Jeffrey Walton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey Walt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104455
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104455
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #1)
> What's the configuration of the compiler? Eg, the output of gcc -v
Thanks Richard. I set-up a Debian Qemu/Chroot for armhf. I can now duplicate
the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104455
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|