[Bug target/104440] nvptx: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr53465.c execution test

2022-02-21 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104440 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/104440] nvptx: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr53465.c execution test

2022-02-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104440 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:02aedc6f269b5e3c1f354edcf5b84d27b0a15946 commit r12-7312-g02aedc6f269b5e3c1f354edcf5b84d27b0a15946 Author: Tom de Vries Date: We

[Bug target/104440] nvptx: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr53465.c execution test

2022-02-20 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104440 --- Comment #11 from Tom de Vries --- Posted patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-February/590627.html

[Bug target/104440] nvptx: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr53465.c execution test

2022-02-16 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104440 --- Comment #10 from Tom de Vries --- A good thing to note at this point: why doesn't init-regs work here? The pass works per insn, and when hitting the insn with the problematic use: ... (gdb) call debug_rtx (insn) (insn 18 17 19 4 (set (reg/v

[Bug target/104440] nvptx: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr53465.c execution test

2022-02-16 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104440 --- Comment #9 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1) > Tentative patch that fixes example: > ... > diff --git a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.cc b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.cc > index 5b26c0f4c7dd..4dc154434853 100644 > --- a/gc

[Bug target/104440] nvptx: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr53465.c execution test

2022-02-16 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104440 --- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 52456 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52456&action=edit Tentative patch, introducing -minit-regs=<0|1|2> This patch fixes the problem, and survived a standalone build

[Bug target/104440] nvptx: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr53465.c execution test

2022-02-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104440 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > > (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #4) > > > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > > > > I thought

[Bug target/104440] nvptx: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr53465.c execution test

2022-02-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104440 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-02-08 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/104440] nvptx: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr53465.c execution test

2022-02-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104440 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #4) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > > I thought there was another bug that reported a similar issue. > > You mean related to nvptx, or in general? It

[Bug target/104440] nvptx: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr53465.c execution test

2022-02-08 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104440 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > I thought there was another bug that reported a similar issue. You mean related to nvptx, or in general? FWIW, I do remember looking at this issue before in the

[Bug target/104440] nvptx: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr53465.c execution test

2022-02-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104440 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- >Unfortunately, pass_initialize_regs does not insert the required init. There is some ideas of getting rid of pass_initialize_regs for GCC 13 too.

[Bug target/104440] nvptx: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr53465.c execution test

2022-02-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104440 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I thought there was another bug that reported a similar issue.

[Bug target/104440] nvptx: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr53465.c execution test

2022-02-08 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104440 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Target||nvptx Keywords|