https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102768
--- Comment #3 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
well, protection mechanisms are rarely equivalent. neither scs nor
traditional stack protector are perfect.
to me compiler support for freestanding environments such as linux
makes sense. i cannot i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102768
--- Comment #2 from ashimida ---
(In reply to nsz from comment #1)
> note that this at least
>
> - requires runtime support (to manage the shadow stack),
> - needs a reserved register (x18),
> - affects unwinding (shadow stack must be unwoun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102768
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102768
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Component|rtl-opti
