subject:"\[Bug target\/101849\] MMA built\-in dies with a verify

[Bug target/101849] MMA built-in dies with a verify_gimple failed error

2021-09-02 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101849 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/101849] MMA built-in dies with a verify_gimple failed error

2021-09-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101849 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de2114d2f1792beae55dccb512c4c521b934e72b commit r10-10091-gde2114d2f1792beae55dccb512c4c521b934e72b Author: Peter Bergner

[Bug target/101849] MMA built-in dies with a verify_gimple failed error

2021-09-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101849 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:585667735e9fb7a38357a84d4d25206a8ccec576 commit r11-8951-g585667735e9fb7a38357a84d4d25206a8ccec576 Author: Peter Bergner

[Bug target/101849] MMA built-in dies with a verify_gimple failed error

2021-08-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101849 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0963c4379becafaebd8e52b0b42698ff151c293 commit r12-3034-gb0963c4379becafaebd8e52b0b42698ff151c293 Author: Peter Bergner Date: T

[Bug target/101849] MMA built-in dies with a verify_gimple failed error

2021-08-12 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101849 --- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #4) > Is there a benefit of one over the other? ...other than the build2 code > being simpler since we'd just pass in the type we want. So the following seems to wor

[Bug target/101849] MMA built-in dies with a verify_gimple failed error

2021-08-11 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101849 --- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > If you are using build_simple_mem_ref then the pointer type has to be > "correct", > but you can simply build the MEM_REF with build2 giving it the desired > ac

[Bug target/101849] MMA built-in dies with a verify_gimple failed error

2021-08-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101849 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- If you are using build_simple_mem_ref then the pointer type has to be "correct", but you can simply build the MEM_REF with build2 giving it the desired access type - the pointer type is irrelevant. Note th

[Bug target/101849] MMA built-in dies with a verify_gimple failed error

2021-08-10 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101849 --- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner --- So it seems when we go to expand the gimple builtin, the cast of the pointer is already stripped away: (gdb) ps gsi_stmt(*gsi) _1 = __builtin_vsx_lxvp (0, x); We will only will get as far as expanding the