https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101726
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Stefan Kneifel from comment #4)
> Yes, but a programmer might choose to implement target clones for a shared
> library using another language, e.g. hand-optimized assembler code (this was
> the a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101726
--- Comment #4 from Stefan Kneifel ---
Yes, but a programmer might choose to implement target clones for a shared
library using another language, e.g. hand-optimized assembler code (this was
the actual problem I had).
Forbidding target_clone de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101726
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
So the solution won't be so easy. We generally face the problem that:
voidfoo (void) __attribute__
((target_clones("avx512f,avx2,avx,default")));
is only a declaration. If we consider anot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101726
--- Comment #2 from Stefan Kneifel ---
OK, so declaring the default function as local might make gcc assume that the
function body is available in the same translation unit, thus rendering the
relocation locally resolvable.
Thus said, I tried
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101726
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
