https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101185
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #1)
> So would the solution of increasing one more unit(or maybe more) for cost of
> mask->integer and integer->mask as compensation for changing alloca order be
> accepta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101185
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #1)
> Alloc order is just another kind of cost which can be compensated by
> increasing cost of mask->integer and integer->mask.
>
> With below patch , pr96814 wouldn't g
