https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101022
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101022
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Carl Love :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:913b13fcb1dceea0e57a04cb77b11097b132cbf6
commit r12-1483-g913b13fcb1dceea0e57a04cb77b11097b132cbf6
Author: Carl Love
Date: Thu Jun 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101022
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Hi Carl -- while you're in there, can you please remove these?
+BU_P10_OVERLOAD_2 (VRLQ, "vrlq")
+BU_P10_OVERLOAD_2 (VSLQ, "vslq")
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101022
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cel at us dot ibm.com
--- Comment #3 from C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101022
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt ---
Looks like the proper pattern should be altivec_eqv1ti.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101022
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,
