[Bug target/100704] Vector register isn't used to push BLKmode argument onto stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100704 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/100704] Vector register isn't used to push BLKmode argument onto stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100704 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:967b46530234b4e6ad3983057705aea6c20a03c4 commit r12-1564-g967b46530234b4e6ad3983057705aea6c20a03c4 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri May 21 11

[Bug target/100704] Vector register isn't used to push BLKmode argument onto stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100704 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug target/100704] Vector register isn't used to push BLKmode argument onto stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100704 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Hmm, I didn't realize we can't push %xmm regs... With loads+stores the > pushes do not look less efficient for this particular example? I suppose a > nice > archite

[Bug target/100704] Vector register isn't used to push BLKmode argument onto stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100704 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Hmm, I didn't realize we can't push %xmm regs... With loads+stores the pushes do not look less efficient for this particular example? I suppose a nice architectural enhancement would be a push-multiple -