[Bug sanitizer/92474] Sanitizer breaks tail-recursion optimization

2025-03-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92474 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug sanitizer/92474] Sanitizer breaks tail-recursion optimization

2025-03-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92474 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||tail-call --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pin

[Bug sanitizer/92474] Sanitizer breaks tail-recursion optimization

2020-01-23 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92474 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/92474] Sanitizer breaks tail-recursion optimization

2019-11-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92474 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- No, feel free to file it.

[Bug sanitizer/92474] Sanitizer breaks tail-recursion optimization

2019-11-12 Thread Hi-Angel at yandex dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92474 --- Comment #2 from Konstantin Kharlamov --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Note, starting with r273603, the trunk doesn't tail call optimize this > either even without -fsanitize=, unless -fno-tree-sra. Is there a report for this

[Bug sanitizer/92474] Sanitizer breaks tail-recursion optimization

2019-11-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92474 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note, starting with r273603, the trunk doesn't tail call optimize this either even without -fsanitize=, unless -fno-tree-sra.