[Bug sanitizer/67204] documentation for sanitizer missing/incomplete

2015-08-17 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67204 --- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #10) > Are you sure? I've been using it with libubsan in GCC trunk... Ah, ok, it seems to work: $ UBSAN_OPTIONS=print_stacktrace=1 ./a.out r.c:6:10: runtime error: si

[Bug sanitizer/67204] documentation for sanitizer missing/incomplete

2015-08-17 Thread y.gribov at samsung dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67204 --- Comment #10 from Yury Gribov --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5) > (In reply to smagnet from comment #3) > > Moreover, the undefined behavior sanitizer runtime options (UBSAN_OPTIONS, > > as described here > >

[Bug sanitizer/67204] documentation for sanitizer missing/incomplete

2015-08-17 Thread y.gribov at samsung dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67204 --- Comment #9 from Yury Gribov --- (In reply to Dmitry Vyukov from comment #8) > (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #7) > > I'm not saying that anyone should stop working on what they are doing to > > implement this, but if a voluntee

[Bug sanitizer/67204] documentation for sanitizer missing/incomplete

2015-08-17 Thread dvyukov at google dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67204 Dmitry Vyukov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dvyukov at google dot com --- Comment #8

[Bug sanitizer/67204] documentation for sanitizer missing/incomplete

2015-08-17 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67204 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug sanitizer/67204] documentation for sanitizer missing/incomplete

2015-08-17 Thread y.gribov at samsung dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67204 Yury Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||y.gribov at samsung dot com --- Comment #6

[Bug sanitizer/67204] documentation for sanitizer missing/incomplete

2015-08-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67204 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to smagnet from comment #3) > Moreover, the undefined behavior sanitizer runtime options (UBSAN_OPTIONS, > as described here >

[Bug sanitizer/67204] documentation for sanitizer missing/incomplete

2015-08-13 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67204 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug sanitizer/67204] documentation for sanitizer missing/incomplete

2015-08-13 Thread smagnet at yopmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67204 --- Comment #3 from smagnet at yopmail dot com --- > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Debugging-Options.html#Debugging-Options > What exactly are you missing? Basically, I think the information from the address sanitizer wiki (and the other lin

[Bug sanitizer/67204] documentation for sanitizer missing/incomplete

2015-08-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67204 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Just for reference this is the documentation that is included in GCC (minus the formating): -fsanitize=address Enable AddressSanitizer, a fast memory error detector. Memory access instructions are instrumente

[Bug sanitizer/67204] documentation for sanitizer missing/incomplete

2015-08-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67204 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment