https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61547
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61547
--- Comment #6 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Thu Oct 16 13:46:39 2014
New Revision: 216326
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216326&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
New asan-instrumentation-with-call-threshold
parameter.
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61547
Yuri Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tetra2005 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61547
--- Comment #4 from Kostya Serebryany ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> (In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #2)
> > Note that in clang we chose not to instrument any builtins in compiler,
> > but instead fully rely on in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61547
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #2)
> Note that in clang we chose not to instrument any builtins in compiler,
> but instead fully rely on interceptors.
So you never expand such builtins inline?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61547
--- Comment #2 from Kostya Serebryany ---
Note that in clang we chose not to instrument any builtins in compiler,
but instead fully rely on interceptors.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61547
--- Comment #1 from Yury Gribov ---
Created attachment 32964
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32964&action=edit
Proposed patch
Adding draft patch. I only ran Asan regression tests though (leaving for long
vacation today). Per
