[Bug sanitizer/59136] llvm-symbolizer shouldn't be started always

2013-11-14 Thread samsonov at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59136 --- Comment #4 from Alexey Samsonov --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > (In reply to Alexey Samsonov from comment #2) > > We found it convenient to run fork+exec early at program startup. It can > > also be slightly dangerous to call

[Bug sanitizer/59136] llvm-symbolizer shouldn't be started always

2013-11-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59136 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Alexey Samsonov from comment #2) > We found it convenient to run fork+exec early at program startup. It can > also be slightly dangerous to call fork() in multi-threaded program (even > though we

[Bug sanitizer/59136] llvm-symbolizer shouldn't be started always

2013-11-14 Thread samsonov at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59136 --- Comment #2 from Alexey Samsonov --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #0) > I've noticed that libasan/liblsan now start external llvm-symbolizer for all > programs just in case they would be buggy, that looks like a very bad idea > to me

[Bug sanitizer/59136] llvm-symbolizer shouldn't be started always

2013-11-14 Thread kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59136 Kostya Serebryany changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glider at google dot com,