https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.3 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.1 |4.8.2
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.8.1
--- Comment #25 from Jaku
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-05
15:55:41 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 5 15:55:31 2013
New Revision: 195761
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195761
Log:
PR sanitizer/55374
* config/gn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #23 from Eric Botcazou 2013-02-05
09:08:19 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Feb 5 09:08:09 2013
New Revision: 195749
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195749
Log:
PR sanitizer/55374
* confi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-30
18:06:09 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 30 18:05:53 2013
New Revision: 195585
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195585
Log:
PR sanitizer/55374
* gcc.c (LI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #21 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-01-29
09:44:22 UTC ---
> we could similarly error for
> -static-libstdc++ -fsanitize=address combination.
Maybe.
Generally this works (in clang at least) and no one complained yet.
The bug ht
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-29
09:29:39 UTC ---
Ah, you're right. My patch is mostly to fix -static-libasan or even
non-static-libasan - to make sure it comes early and thus override what it
thinks it actually overrides. F
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #19 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-01-29
09:18:49 UTC ---
>
> As with the patch for this PR -lasan is linked before -lstdc++, the wrapper
> should kick in. But the patch is still unreviewed.
How?
If we are linking both libra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-29
09:13:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Note that there is at least one known bug in asan with -static-libstdc++
> https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/issues/detail?id=147
As wi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #17 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-01-29
09:10:24 UTC ---
Note that there is at least one known bug in asan with -static-libstdc++
https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/issues/detail?id=147
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
David Abdurachmanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.abdurachmanov at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-22
13:35:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 29249
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29249
gcc48-pr55374.patch
Untested fix. If -static-libasan is missing, it just moves -lasan ear
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-22
10:52:55 UTC ---
One way out of this would be for libasan.a to be an *.o object rather than *.a
archive:
mv libasan.a libasan_a.a
gcc -Wl,-r -nostdlib -o libasan.a -Wl,--whole-archive libasan_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-22
10:33:53 UTC ---
The patch isn't sufficient. For both -static-libasan -fsanitize=address
and just -fsanitize=address, we want -Bstatic -lasan -Bdynamic resp. -lasan
to go before all occurrence
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #11 from Joost VandeVondele
2012-12-20 20:43:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> cd obj*/x86_64*/libgfortran; make clean; \
> make CFLAGS="-std=gnu99 -g -O2 -fsanitize=address " \
> FCFLAGS="-g -O2 -fsanitize=address" LDF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-20
20:11:55 UTC ---
cd obj*/x86_64*/libgfortran; make clean; \
make CFLAGS="-std=gnu99 -g -O2 -fsanitize=address " \
FCFLAGS="-g -O2 -fsanitize=address" LDFLAGS="-B
`pwd`/../libsanitizer/asan/.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #9 from Joost VandeVondele
2012-12-20 20:05:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> bootstrap-asan is for bootstrapping GCC with -fsanitize=address.
> It is orthogonal from compiling target run-time li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-20 19:58:44
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Thanks now bootstrap completes.
>
> It seems to me that libgfortran is not built with -fsanitize=address despite
> --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #7 from Joost VandeVondele
2012-12-20 19:55:32 UTC ---
Thanks now bootstrap completes.
It seems to me that libgfortran is not built with -fsanitize=address despite
--with-build-config=bootstrap-asan
Is there a way to mak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-20 19:24:49
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> After applying your patch, I now get to the errors below any known
> workaround ?
>
> ../../gcc/libiberty/regex.c:4497: error: undefined reference to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
Summary|[asan] Wrong
25 matches
Mail list logo
