[Bug sanitizer/110876] AddressSanitizer: false positive bad-free

2023-08-10 Thread dvirtz at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110876 --- Comment #4 from Dvir Yitzchaki --- Thanks @Andrew. Is it undefined behavior to recover from SIGABRT? I didn't find a source for that. The fact is that the memory ASAN is complaining about was allocated.

[Bug sanitizer/110876] AddressSanitizer: false positive bad-free

2023-08-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110876 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- I looked into the code and I think this is a boost issue, it is specifically catching the abort signal and recovering and then exit is called and messes up.

[Bug sanitizer/110876] AddressSanitizer: false positive bad-free

2023-08-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110876 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- clang trunk has the same failure. clang 11.0.0 has the same failure. clang 10.0.0 references https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/189 . I am thinking this is boost issue because both clang and GCC pr

[Bug sanitizer/110876] AddressSanitizer: false positive bad-free

2023-08-02 Thread dvirtz at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110876 --- Comment #1 from Dvir Yitzchaki --- Created attachment 55676 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55676&action=edit preprocessed code