https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107698
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107698
--- Comment #2 from Li Shaohua ---
I found a new test where gcc-O1 misses the global-buffer-overflow. Not sure if
these two have the same root cause:
% cat a.c
int a, c;
int *b = &a;
int main() {
int d = *b;
for (; c < 3; c++)
b = b + (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107698
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ev
