https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avr at gjlay dot de
--- Comment #12 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
--- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Aug 22 10:07:51 2017
New Revision: 251271
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251271&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-05-06 trunk r247719.
PR rtl-opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jul 25 11:55:44 2017
New Revision: 250511
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250511&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-05-06 trunk r247719.
PR rtl-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
--- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jul 25 11:39:23 2017
New Revision: 250509
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250509&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-05-06 trunk r247719.
PR rtl-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #5)
> Fixed on trunk. It doesn't look like it's a regression, but maybe we want
> to backport anyway?
We usually backport wrong-code fixes to active branches
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #5)
> It doesn't look like it's a regression, but maybe we want to backport anyway?
Would be great. It's wrong code after all, and the fix appears to be low
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sat May 6 07:44:13 2017
New Revision: 247719
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247719&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 75964: Invalid integer ABS handling in simplify-rtx.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
> So it's not only wrong code but also wrong diagnostic...
It's rather a consistent diagnostic, there could have been wrong code and no
diagnostic at all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #2 from Georg-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
14 matches
Mail list logo