https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71636
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71636
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #2 from Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71636
--- Comment #1 from Richard Henderson ---
Oh, and I meant to mention -- if the target doesn't have an andnot
insn, both formulations are identical in complexity and minimal path.
Which might suggest *always* performing the transformation at a
hi
