[Bug rtl-optimization/68641] undefined variables implicitly considered to be zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68641 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #13 f

[Bug rtl-optimization/68641] undefined variables implicitly considered to be zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68641 --- Comment #12 from Joost VandeVondele --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #11) > That sounds like a bug. It works for me on a simple C testcase. sorry, fat fingers on my side. So, yes, this works gfortran -c -Werror=uninitialized -Wno-

[Bug rtl-optimization/68641] undefined variables implicitly considered to be zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68641 --- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #10) > [I just checked that -Wuninitialized -Wno-maybe-uninitialized doesn't work] That sounds like a bug. It works for me on a simple C testcase.

[Bug rtl-optimization/68641] undefined variables implicitly considered to be zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68641 --- Comment #10 from Joost VandeVondele --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #9) > Though with the testcase you gave we warn at both -O0 and -O1: yes, but unfortunately, -Wuninitialized, also warns for 'may be used uninitialized' whi

[Bug rtl-optimization/68641] undefined variables implicitly considered to be zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68641 --- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 2 Dec 2015, Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68641 > > Joost VandeVondele changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/68641] undefined variables implicitly considered to be zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68641 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz

[Bug rtl-optimization/68641] undefined variables implicitly considered to be zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68641 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 2 Dec 2015, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68641 > > --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- > > OTOH I'd just use it as an excuse to dr

[Bug rtl-optimization/68641] undefined variables implicitly considered to be zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68641 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- > OTOH I'd just use it as an excuse to drop init-regs.c ... It has a rather big comment explaining why it was needed though.

[Bug rtl-optimization/68641] undefined variables implicitly considered to be zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68641 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- See PR61810 which shows missed optimizations because of init-regs.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/68641] undefined variables implicitly considered to be zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68641 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 2 Dec 2015, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68641 > > Eric Botcazou changed: > >What|Removed |Adde

[Bug rtl-optimization/68641] undefined variables implicitly considered to be zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68641 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #3 from Eric Bot

[Bug rtl-optimization/68641] undefined variables implicitly considered to be zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68641 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug rtl-optimization/68641] undefined variables implicitly considered to be zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68641 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|