[Bug rtl-optimization/60473] optimization after shift sub-optimal

2020-08-18 Thread roger at nextmovesoftware dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60473 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/60473] optimization after shift sub-optimal

2020-08-04 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60473 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:76eafcc395d2bcd4147cb1ba1a8aff321571402f commit r11-2551-g76eafcc395d2bcd4147cb1ba1a8aff321571402f Author: Roger Sayle Date: Tue Au

[Bug rtl-optimization/60473] optimization after shift sub-optimal

2014-03-10 Thread marmoo1024 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60473 --- Comment #1 from Martin --- After some checking I've found that the problem is with the binary OR operator. Addition doesn't have a problem but or does. Here are my results. unsigned long long **_rdtsc_64 () { unsigned long long h,l;